Written Communication Oct 2013

Resistance and Common Ground as Functions of Mis/aligned Attitudes: A Filter-Theory Analysis of Ranchers’ Writings About the Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project

Lynda Walsh University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

Writing scholars interested in stakeholder attitudes need ways to reconstruct them from archives because (a) interview/survey studies are not always feasible (particularly in historical work) and (b) the question/answer format of these studies may exclude key attitudes that emerge in unprompted expressions of opinion. Accordingly, this article argues for filter theory—a pragmatic model of interpretive attitudes—as an effective hermeneutic for archival reception studies. Complementing a previous study of administrative attitudes about the Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project, the present study applies filter theory to a sample of ranchers’ written opinions about the Project. The main findings are as follows: Ranchers and administrators differentially value resident rights versus Project goals; ranchers warrant resistance to the Project based on these misaligned attitudes; nonetheless, both groups value the ideal of a balanced environment and evidence collected on the ground. These findings suggest the need to redefine rhetorical resistance and common ground as arguments warranted by mis/alignments between groups’ interpretive attitudes. They also indicate revisions to initial recommendations for extending rhetorical common ground in the Project.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088313498362
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Tillery et al. (2022)
    Hyperrationality and Rhetorical Constellations in Digital Climate Change Denial…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Pflugfelder (2022)
    Evidence Engines: Common Rhetorical Features of Fraudulent Academic Articles
    Written Communication
  3. Walsh (2019)
    A Zero-Sum Politics of Identification: A Topological Analysis of Wildlife Advoc…
    Written Communication
  4. Walsh (2018)
    Visual Invention and the Composition of Scientific Research Graphics: A Topolog…
    Written Communication
  5. Walker (2016)
    Mapping the Contours of Translation: Visualized Un/Certainties in the Ozone Hol…
    Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 6 →
  1. Charney (2015)
    Getting to “How Do You Know?” Rather Than “So What?” From “What's New?”
    Technical Communication Quarterly

References (54) · 3 in this index

  1. Adaptive Management Oversight Committee. (2005). Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project 5-year review…
  2. 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00061-2
     ↗
  3. Barrett S. (2012)
    International Wolf
  4. Bath A. (2000)
    Human dimensions in wolf management in Savoie and Des Alpes Maritimes, France
  5. Beeland T. D. L. (2008). Information sources, beliefs and values of key stakeholder groups in Mexican gray wo…
Show all 54 →
  1. Biesecker B. (1992)
    Philosophy & Rhetoric
  2. 10.1080/10871209609359048
     ↗
  3. 10.1080/10871200802712571
     ↗
  4. Burke K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press. Retrieved from http:/…
  5. 10.1525/9780520341715
     ↗
  6. Burke K. (1984)
    Permanence and change
  7. 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     ↗
  8. 10.1353/par.1999.0001
     ↗
  9. Duda M. D. (1995)
    New Mexico residents’ opinions toward Mexican wolf reintroduction
  10. Eberly R. A. (2000)
    Citizen critics: Literary public spheres
  11. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00258-6
     ↗
  12. Foucault M. (1978)
    The History of Sexuality
  13. Gold D. (2008)
    Beyond the archives: Research as a lived process
  14. 10.1080/00028533.2012.11821776
     ↗
  15. Gross A. G. (1997)
    Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science
  16. Habermas J. (1979)
    Communication and the evolution of society
  17. Harris R. A. (2005)
    Rhetoric and incommensurability
  18. Huckin et al. (2012)
    Critical Discourse Analysis and Rhetoric and Composition
    College Composition and Communication
  19. 10.2307/468585
     ↗
  20. 10.1017/CBO9780511812408
     ↗
  21. 10.1007/s12129-004-1031-4
     ↗
  22. 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[154:TIOPAO]2.0.CO;2
     ↗
  23. Messmer T. A. (1999)
    Wildlife Society Bulletin
  24. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00060.x
     ↗
  25. Nie M. A. (2001)
    Human Ecology Review
  26. Olman L. C. (2003)
    Paper presented at the 11th Student Conference in Linguistics
  27. 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01201.x
     ↗
  28. Perelman C. (1969)
    The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation
  29. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x
     ↗
  30. Radway J. A. (1991)
    Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature
  31. Romo R. (2007, December 2). Wolf-proof shelters go up for school kids. Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved from ht…
  32. Ross (2013)
    Common Topics and Commonplaces of Environmental Rhetoric
    Written Communication
  33. Schauber E. (1986)
    The bounds of interpretation: Linguistic theory and literary text
  34. 10.1080/10871209709359101
     ↗
  35. Simonich M. (2012, August 29). State has spent more than $200K defending wolf lawsuit. Alamogordo Daily News.…
  36. Sperber D. (1986)
    Relevance: Communication and Cognition
  37. 10.1177/0170840605054626
     ↗
  38. 10.1080/08941929309380817
     ↗
  39. Treves A. (2008)
    Wildlife and society: The science of human dimensions
  40. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1996). Reintroduction of the Mexican wolf within its historic range in the s…
  41. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2011). Causes of documented Mexican wolf mortalities in the Blue Range Wolf …
  42. van Dijk T. A. (1983)
    Strategies of discourse comprehension
  43. 10.1075/pc.15.1.11eem
     ↗
  44. Walsh L. (2006)
    Rhetorical agendas: Political, ethical, spiritual
  45. Walsh L. (2006)
    Sins against science: The scientific hoaxes of Poe, Twain, and Others
  46. Walsh (2009)
    Marking Territory: Legislated Genres, Stakeholder Beliefs, and the Possibilitie…
    Written Communication
  47. 10.1080/08941929709381044
     ↗
  48. 10.1177/0963662510371435
     ↗
  49. 10.1093/poq/nfj009
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Navigating platform algorithms: Global south feminist activists’ rhetorical and composition practices in digital advocacy on social media ↗
    Kalpana Shrestha
    rhetorical criticism social media gender and writing
  2. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    Legacies, commitments, and new challenges: The Sweetland Digital Rhetoric Collaborative interviews three generations of Computers and Composition editors ↗
    Ali Alalem; Alyse Campbell; Thais Rodrigues Cons; Funmilola Fadairo; Nicole Koyuki Golden
    rhetorical criticism collaborative writing digital rhetoric
  3. Computers and Composition Jun 2026
    How Baldwin's voice moved Cambridge: Activation contours, mimesis, and a computational approach to rhetoric's sensorium ↗
    David M. Rieder; Michael R. Jackson
    rhetorical criticism
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly May 2026
    Andrew Carnegie and the Rhetorical History of Business and Professional Communication ↗
    Joe Edward Hatfield
    rhetorical criticism teacher development professional writing archival research
  5. Written Communication May 2026
    Tuning In: Rhetorical Attunement as a Methodological Practice for Collaborative Research ↗
    Amber Hedquist; Liliana Caughman; Claire Lauer
    rhetorical criticism collaborative writing