Resistance and Common Ground as Functions of Mis/aligned Attitudes

Written Communication Oct 2013

Resistance and Common Ground as Functions of Mis/aligned Attitudes

Lynda Walsh University of Nevada, Reno

Abstract

Writing scholars interested in stakeholder attitudes need ways to reconstruct them from archives because (a) interview/survey studies are not always feasible (particularly in historical work) and (b) the question/answer format of these studies may exclude key attitudes that emerge in unprompted expressions of opinion. Accordingly, this article argues for filter theory—a pragmatic model of interpretive attitudes—as an effective hermeneutic for archival reception studies. Complementing a previous study of administrative attitudes about the Mexican Wolf Blue Range Reintroduction Project, the present study applies filter theory to a sample of ranchers’ written opinions about the Project. The main findings are as follows: Ranchers and administrators differentially value resident rights versus Project goals; ranchers warrant resistance to the Project based on these misaligned attitudes; nonetheless, both groups value the ideal of a balanced environment and evidence collected on the ground. These findings suggest the need to redefine rhetorical resistance and common ground as arguments warranted by mis/alignments between groups’ interpretive attitudes. They also indicate revisions to initial recommendations for extending rhetorical common ground in the Project.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2013-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088313498362
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multimodality revision

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

Tillery et al. (2022)

Hyperrationality and Rhetorical Constellations in Digital Climate Change Denial…

Technical Communication Quarterly
Pflugfelder (2022)

Evidence Engines: Common Rhetorical Features of Fraudulent Academic Articles

Written Communication
Walsh (2019)

A Zero-Sum Politics of Identification: A Topological Analysis of Wildlife Advoc…

Written Communication
Walsh (2018)

Visual Invention and the Composition of Scientific Research Graphics: A Topolog…

Written Communication
Walker (2016)

Mapping the Contours of Translation: Visualized Un/Certainties in the Ozone Hol…

Technical Communication Quarterly

Show all 6 →

Charney (2015)

Getting to “How Do You Know?” Rather Than “So What?” From “What's New?”

Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (3)

Ross (2013)

Common Topics and Commonplaces of Environmental Rhetoric

Written Communication
Huckin et al. (2012)

Critical Discourse Analysis and Rhetoric and Composition

College Composition and Communication
Walsh (2009)

Marking Territory

Written Communication

Also cites 22 works outside this index ↓

10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00061-2

↗
10.1080/10871209609359048

↗
10.1080/10871200802712571

↗
10.1525/9780520341715

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511620539

↗
10.1353/par.1999.0001

↗
10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00258-6

↗
10.1080/00028533.2012.11821776

↗
10.2307/468585

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511812408

↗
10.1007/s12129-004-1031-4

↗
10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[154:TIOPAO]2.0.CO;2

↗
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00060.x

↗
10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01201.x

↗
10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00099.x

↗
10.1080/10871209709359101

↗
10.1177/0170840605054626

↗
10.1080/08941929309380817

↗
10.1075/pc.15.1.11eem

↗
10.1080/08941929709381044

↗
10.1177/0963662510371435

↗
10.1093/poq/nfj009

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →