Written Communication Apr 2022

Evidence Engines: Common Rhetorical Features of Fraudulent Academic Articles

Ehren Helmut Pflugfelder Oregon State University

Abstract

Predatory publishers deliver neither the editorial oversight, nor the peer review of legitimate publishers, and benefit from those whose positions require academic publications. These publishers also provide a home for conspiracy theorists and pseudoscience promoters, as their lack of scrutiny offers fraudulent academic research articles a veneer of scholarly credibility. While most predatory journals were designed to dupe researchers, the fraudulent articles they often publish are designed to be found by members of the public, and their accessibility ensures that unlike legitimate research, they are likely to be employed as evidence by those seeking evidence. While studies have examined the common features of predatory journals, their emails, and their websites, this essay situates fraudulent academic articles in posttruth discourse, offers a taxonomy of illegitimate research articles, and highlights their common rhetorical features, in the hopes that the concepts discovered here can further contribute to pedagogy and public understanding.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2022-04-01
DOI
10.1177/07410883211069332
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy book reviews
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Fahnestock (2025)
    The Controversy behind the Controversies: Scientific Discourse in the Twenty-Fi…
    Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Mehlenbacher et al. (2025)
    Misinformation As Genre Function: Insights on the Infodemic from a Genre-Theore…
    Technical Communication Quarterly

References (77) · 8 in this index

  1. 10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.08.002
     ↗
  2. Beall’s list. (n.d.). https://beallslist.net
  3. Bik E. (2020a). Science Integrity Digest. https://scienceintegritydigest.com
  4. Bik E. (2020b, August 4). The journal of brouhaha. Science Integrity Digest. https://scienceintegritydigest.c…
  5. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1527378
     ↗
Show all 77 →
  1. 10.1038/526613f
     ↗
  2. 10.1126/science.342.6154.60
     ↗
  3. 10.1177/1329878X20946113
     ↗
  4. Busch C., De Maret P. S., Flynn T., Kellum R., Le S., Meyers B., Saunders M., White R., Palmquist M. (2012). …
  5. Butler D. (2013, March 27). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature News. https://www.nat…
  6. Cagle L. E. (2018)
    Scientific communication: Practices, theories, and pedagogies
  7. Canagarajah (2006)
    The Place of World Englishes in Composition: Pluralization Continued
    College Composition and Communication
  8. Carey K. (2016, December 29). A peek inside the strange world of fake academia. The New York Times. https://w…
  9. 10.7330/9781607327912
     ↗
  10. 10.1353/rap.2010.0222
     ↗
  11. 10.14321/j.ctt7zt5wp
     ↗
  12. Charney (2003)
    Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus
    Written Communication
  13. Chawla D. S. (2021, February 8). Hundreds of “predatory” journals indexed on leading scholarly database. Natu…
  14. Check Please! (n.d.). Starter course. https://www.notion.so/checkpleasecc/Check-Please-Starter-Course-ae34d04…
  15. 10.26818/9780814213612
     ↗
  16. 10.1007/s10805-019-09346-0
     ↗
  17. Elbein A. (2010, April 22). “What’s the deal with birds?” A new paper asks while making a point. Audubon Maga…
  18. 10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
     ↗
  19. Feltman R. (2015, July 8). “Fraudulent” peer review strikes another academic publisher; 32 articles questione…
  20. 10.1080/19393555.2020.1804647
     ↗
  21. Glaser B. G. (1998)
    Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions
  22. Glaser B. G. (2007)
    The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research
  23. 10.1080/00083968.2005.10751326
     ↗
  24. 10.1080/10570318109374052
     ↗
  25. 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
     ↗
  26. Hanauer et al. (2011)
    Quantifying the Burden of Writing Research Articles in a Second Language: Data …
    Written Communication
  27. 10.1177/0963662514559891
     ↗
  28. Hern A. (2020, May 7). 5G conspiracy theories fuel attacks on telecom workers. The Guardian. https://www.theg…
  29. Hofstadter R. (1966)
    The paranoid style in American politics and other essays
  30. 10.2307/1512118
     ↗
  31. 10.1525/abt.2010.72.7.5
     ↗
  32. 10.1187/cbe.11-03-0027
     ↗
  33. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. (n.d.). 5G radiofrequency: RF EMF. icnirp.org.…
  34. Jarry J. (2020, November 5). This paper argues an amulet may protect from COVID: Should it have been publishe…
  35. Kaye D. H. (n.d.). Flaky academic journals. http://flakyj.blogspot.com
  36. Kolata G. (2019, April 3). The price for “predatory” publishing? $50 million. The New York Times. https://www…
  37. 10.1002/asi.23521
     ↗
  38. 10.1177/0162243920923087
     ↗
  39. The Lancet. (n.d.). Open access and funding. https://www.thelancet.com/open-access.
  40. Lu et al. (2016)
    Guest Editors’ Introduction: Translingual Work
    College English
  41. Marcus A., Oransky I. (n.d.). Retraction watch. https://retractionwatch.com
  42. Markowitz D. M., Powell J. H., Hancock J. T. (2014). The writing style of predatory publishers [Conference se…
  43. 10.2307/25472180
     ↗
  44. 10.2307/j.ctt1w76tbg
     ↗
  45. Nature. (n.d.). Publishing options. https://www.nature.com/nature/for-authors/publishing-options
  46. Oreskes N. (2011)
    Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco…
  47. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003
     ↗
  48. Pipes D. (1997)
    Conspiracy: How the paranoid style flourishes and where it comes from
  49. Predatory Publishing. (n.d.). https://predatory-publishing.com
  50. 10.1177/0270467614529707
     ↗
  51. Redden E. (2021, July 13). Buying off an academic journal? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/n…
  52. 10.26818/9780814214350
     ↗
  53. Ross (2009)
    ARS Dictaminis Perverted: The Personal Solicitation E-Mail as a Genre
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  54. 10.4324/9781315442044
     ↗
  55. Rutherford A. (2014, August 22). In science we trust . up to a point. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.c…
  56. Safi M. (2014, November 25). Journal accepts bogus paper requesting removal from mailing list. The Guardian. …
  57. Schneider L. (n.d.). For better science. https://forbetterscience.com
  58. Secor et al. (2004)
    A Rhetorical Perspective on the Sokal Hoax: Genre, Style, and Context
    Written Communication
  59. Sharma (2018)
    Internalizing Writing in the STEM Disciplines
    Across the Disciplines
  60. 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
     ↗
  61. Society for Scholarly Publishing. (n.d.). The scholarly kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
  62. Sokal A. (1996, May/June). A physicist experiments with cultural studies. Lingua Franca. http://linguafranca.…
  63. Stop Predatory Journals. (n.d.). https://predatoryjournals.com
  64. 10.4324/9781315442044-3
     ↗
  65. 10.37016/mr-2020-015
     ↗
  66. 10.1371/journal.pone.0130422
     ↗
  67. 10.1177/1750698017701615
     ↗
  68. Walsh L. (2006)
    Since against science: The scientific media hoaxes of Poe, Twain, and others
  69. Walsh (2013)
    Resistance and Common Ground as Functions of Mis/aligned Attitudes: A Filter-Th…
    Written Communication
  70. Wiley. (n.d.). Preparing your article. https://authorservices.wiley.com/author-resources/Journal-Authors/Prep…
  71. 10.1002/asi.23265
     ↗
  72. 10.1080/00028533.1990.11951482
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2023
    The State of UX Pedagogy ↗
    Philip B. Gallagher; Guiseppe Getto
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development argument assessment technical communication book reviews
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022
    Arguing with Numbers: The Intersection of Rhetoric and Mathematics ↗
    Christopher Tindale
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy argument qualitative research gender and writing book reviews editorial matter
  3. Rhetorica Jun 2021
    Indecorous Thinking: Figures of Speech in Early Modern Poetics by Colleen Ruth Rosenfeld ↗
    William P. Weaver
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy literacy studies book reviews
  4. Rhetorica Jun 2021
    Weeping for Dido: The Classics in the Medieval Classroom by Marjorie Curry Woods ↗
    Jordan Loveridge
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis writing pedagogy teacher development gender and writing book reviews
  5. Rhetorica Mar 2021
    The Routledge Reader of African American Rhetoric: The Long Durée of Black Voices ed. by Vershawn Ashanti Young and Michelle Bachelor Robinson ↗
    Mudiwa Pettus
    rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics writing pedagogy social media literacy studies race and writing gender and writing public rhetoric book reviews editorial matter