In Defense of Private Writing

Written Communication Apr 1999

PETER ELBOW

Abstract

In the first section, the author addresses the most theoretical criticism of private writing as a false or misleading concept—that writing is inherently or essentially social. The author distinguishes and explores the various forms or senses in which this claim is true; in doing so, the author explores the limitations of certain kinds of totalistic forms of argumentation. In the second section, the author also addresses criticisms that acknowledge the existence of private writing but asserts that it is misguided or harmful. In the final section, the author suggests possibilities for empirical research that might not only throw light on theoretical disputes about the nature of private writing but also provide some concrete help to teachers of writing.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 1999-04-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088399016002001
Open Access: Closed
Topics: empirical research argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

Randazzo (2022)

Bodies of Proof: COVID-19 and Unwitnessed Remote Work

Technical Communication Quarterly
Elbow (2019)

We’ll Sing Like Birds in a Cage: Text and the Dream of Eluding Time

College English
Warnock et al. (2007)

Expressive/Exploratory Technical Writing (XTW) in Engineering: Shifting the Tec…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Heller (2003)

Questionable Categories and the Case for Collaborative Writing

Rhetoric Review
Jones (2002)

John Dewey and Peter Elbow: A Pragmatist Revision of Social Theory and Practice

Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (1)

Bruffee (1984)

Collaborative Learning and the "Conversation of Mankind"

College English

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓

10.2307/358870

↗
10.17763/haer.47.3.404u11453465264r

↗
Harris, J.

A teaching subject: Composition since 1966

↗
Petrey, S.

Speech acts and literary theory

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511803284

↗
10.2307/358932

↗
Steiner, G.

After Babel: Aspects of language and translation

↗
Winnicott, D. W.

The maturational processes and the facilitating environment

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →