Abstract

A“cognitive discourse analysis” was employed to analyze instructions for using a word processor written by eighth-grade students. The approach analyzes text structure in order to specify underlying semantic and conceptual knowledge structures. Our analyses revealed that the written instructions produced by the student writers were deficient in providing a reader with the information necessary for performing the task in two distinct ways. First, the group of students as a whole presented insufficient content information in their texts, particularly with respect to the subprocedures required to use the word processor. Second, the organization of students' texts did not parallel the hierarchical structure of the procedures described. These results suggest the importance of looking at writing from the point of view of the knowledge structures being expressed.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1992-04-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088392009002002
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. The psychology of written composition
  2. 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.117
  3. 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90456-X
  4. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90060-X
  5. 10.1080/01638539109544788
  6. 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90016-X
  7. Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition
  8. 10.1016/S0020-7373(85)80045-6
  9. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90036-7
  10. 10.2307/1167224
  11. 10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90343-6
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →