Writing, Jargon, and Research

Abstract

Two hypotheses are outlined about the reasons for obscurity in expository writing. Neither accounts adequately for the general results of an exploratory study of the writing of postgraduates nor for the individual cases I present by way of illustration. A crucial factor, I suggest, is a person's implicit model of expository writing. Many of our subjects assume that the purpose of technical writing is to compress thought. I argue, on the contrary, that clarity is achieved through expansion.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
1986-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088386003003005
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (25) · 1 in this index

  1. Machine intelligence
  2. The Times
  3. Perspectives in cancer research and treatment
  4. Psychology and Language
  5. Cognitive processes in writing
Show all 25 →
  1. Writing without teachers
  2. The art of plain talk
  3. Cognitive processes in writing
  4. Written Communication
  5. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society
  6. Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax
  7. Letter to The Times
  8. 10.1177/001872678203500104
  9. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech Acts
  10. Annual Conference of the Canadian Council of Teachers of English
  11. 10.1037/h0062709
  12. 10.1007/BF02289565
  13. The Times Literary Supplement
  14. Academics and their writing
  15. Cognitive skills and their acquisition
  16. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb01005.x
    Scandinavian Journal of Psychology  
  17. 10.1207/s15516709cog0802_4
  18. Technical reporting
  19. Visible Language
  20. Visible Language