Abstract

This essay conceptualizes and applies a theory of rhetorical debility to new materialist rhetorical studies. Drawing from critical disability studies, rhetorical debility frames the ways that hierarchical human and nonhuman relations can inhibit certain rhetoricities while enabling others under neoliberalism. This theory extends the concept of “rhetorical capacities,” located within a genealogy of new materialist and posthuman thought in rhetorical studies, in response to intersectional critique of new materialism from Indigenous scholars and disability studies. The essay demonstrates rhetorical debility’s applicability to transnational sites of oppression along axes of disability, colonialism, and neoliberalism through a case study analysis of Palestinian protest rhetoric.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2022-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2021.1990378
Open Access
OA PDF Bronze

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 11 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. College English
  4. College Composition and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 37 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/1350506807084854
  2. 10.1177/0090591703260853
  3. 10.1086/521568
  4. 10.26818/9780814213803
  5. 10.1177/0263276418771486
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt17kk9p8
  7. 10.1177/2057047318794688
  8. 10.1080/07491409.2018.1551686
  9. 10.4324/9781315562063
  10. 10.1057/9781137001184
  11. 10.1080/09687599627570
  12. Keywords for Disability Studies
  13. 10.15353/cjds.v4i2.208
  14. 10.1353/lit.2006.0037
  15. 10.3998/mpub.9892149
  16. 10.3366/soma.2016.0194
  17. 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001
  18. 10.1080/08164649.2015.1046304
  19. 10.1177/1350506812472669
  20. 10.5744/rhm.2018.1014
  21. 10.1177/0263276410380940
  22. 10.18061/dsq.v24i3.511
  23. 10.1515/9780271080338
  24. 10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
  25. 10.1080/00335630.2019.1669895
  26. 10.1080/07491409.2018.1551983
  27. 10.1080/07407700903034147
  28. 10.1017/pli.2018.9
  29. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx
  30. 10.1080/14791420.2020.1787475
  31. 10.1080/0033563042000255516
  32. 10.1080/15358593.2016.1207359
  33. 10.1177/1350506812443477
  34. 10.1111/johs.12124
  35. 10.1353/arq.2008.0002
  36. 10.1080/10570314.2017.1306098
  37. 10.1215/9780822372189
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network →