Abstract

Bisexual discourse is underexamined as such within rhetoric. So too are the historical practices of African American lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer+ (LGBTQ+) communities. Responding to these forms of erasure, my essay advances the study of Black women’s bisexual rhetorics through a focus on the collected papers of a freeborn African American woman, Rebecca Primus (1836–1932). Specifically, the essay offers a comparative analysis of two archival collections containing letters to her: the widely studied Primus Family Papers and the more recently acquired Rebecca Primus Papers. Taken together, these collections offer an enlarged view of Rebecca’s epistolary relationships with people of more than one gender. In doing so, I argue, the new collection reveals a need for a bisexual archival framework, which redresses the limitations of any single collection of romantic letters as a necessarily partial and speculative source of information. This framework affirms Black women’s bisexual rhetorics while recovering a more diverse LGBTQ+ past.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2021-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2020.1841274
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (13)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 13 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College English
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  6. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  7. College Composition and Communication
  8. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/15299710903316489
  2. 10.1080/15299716.2012.702622
  3. 10.1080/00918360903488848
  4. 10.1300/J159v02n02_02
  5. 10.1525/rh.2018.36.3.296
  6. 10.1080/15299710903316513
  7. 10.1080/07491401003669729
  8. 10.1215/10642684-3-4-437
  9. 10.1080/00335630.2012.714899
  10. 10.1080/14791420.2015.1119290
  11. 10.2307/1229039
  12. 10.1080/15299716.2012.729426
  13. 10.1353/par.2000.0017
  14. 10.1080/15299710903316596
  15. 10.1080/15299710903316562
  16. 10.2307/358545
  17. 10.1080/00335639809384203
  18. 10.1080/15299710903316539
  19. 10.1080/15299710903316679
  20. 10.1215/-12-2-1
  21. 10.1007/s12111-008-9072-3
  22. 10.1215/01636545-2849531
  23. 10.1080/10462930128119
  24. 10.1080/15299716.2015.1018658
  25. 10.1080/15299710802659989
  26. 10.1080/15299716.2017.1384423
  27. 10.1215/01636545-2703787
  28. 10.1353/rap.2006.0028
  29. 10.1080/15299716.2015.1033044
  30. 10.1080/07491409.2004.10162473
  31. 10.2307/j.ctt6wrb9s
  32. 10.1300/J159v06n01_05
  33. 10.1215/10642684-2843347
  34. 10.18574/nyu/9781479832149.001.0001
  35. 10.2307/1229482
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →