Abstract

Although models for recovering and theorizing black women’s discourse have focused on examples of communicative eloquence, competence, verbal prowess, and depictions of strategy, these frameworks do not completely account for the racialized threats of violence black women sometimes incur as consequences for their participation in public dialogues. To understand how risk and penalty are activated against black women intellectuals on television and social media, this essay analyzes the controversy and subsequent social media backlash Wake Forest University professor and former MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry experienced in late 2013 after off-hand remarks about former presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s African American grandchild. When read as the consequence of feminist literacy practices and signifying enacted within a hostile surveillance culture, Harris-Perry’s experience reveals an adverse rhetorical condition that penalizes and silences contemporary black women speakers and intellectuals.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2018-03-15
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2017.1392037
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/002193479602600407
  2. 10.1215/9780822375302
  3. 10.1080/1479142042000332134
  4. Standing in the Intersection: Feminist Voices, Feminist Practices in Communication Studies
  5. 10.1177/1362480697001002003
    Theoretical Criminology: An International Journal  
  6. 10.4324/9780203166550
  7. 10.1080/00335637309383176
  8. 10.1080/00335639509384108
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →