Abstract

In 1970, black autoworker James Johnson, Jr., fatally shot three people at Chrysler’s Eldon Avenue Gear and Axel Plant in Detroit. The shooting occurred three years after a devastating urban uprising and in the context of black militant labor organizing in local automotive plants. After a legal defense arguing racism and labor exploitation provoked his actions, Johnson was found not guilty for reasons of insanity. In this essay, I attend to the defense strategy that attempted to retain the political critique implicit in Johnson’s “black rage” while working within the constraints of jurisprudential and clinical notions of “insanity.” The Johnson case suggests that the mobilization of black affect is an always-ambivalent endeavor that can enable radical critique and political practice, while also subordinating black rhetorical agency.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2016-03-14
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2016.1141348
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1215/9780822383871-001
  2. 10.4135/9781483327921
  3. 10.1353/rap.0.0109
  4. 10.1080/00335630903296184
  5. 10.4324/9780203405499
  6. 10.2307/1354446
    Cultural Critique  
  7. 10.1080/15358593.2011.578254
  8. 10.1037/10379-000
  9. 10.1080/15295036.2012.657465
  10. 10.1177/1532708603254434
  11. 10.1353/bhm.0.0320
  12. 10.1017/S004055740900009X
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →