Abstract

This essay explores how the powerful system of cultural references in the architecture of Alexandria is disrupted by Roman visual rhetoric. Specifically, the essay closely analyzes Diocletian’s Victory Column, a monument to the third-century Roman ruler who put down an Alexandrian uprising. The authors argue that Rome employed a visual rhetoric of spectacular disruption as a means to insert itself into the city’s historical identity even after its siege created widespread disease and starvation. The essay builds on the substantial scholarship on public memory by describing a kind of rhetoric that poses a political, existential challenge to a reigning cultural identity. As rhetorical scholars continue to study public memory and the persuasive powers of designed space, the concept of megethos appears to be uniquely and increasingly relevant.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2014-08-08
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2014.938865
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 17 works outside this index ↓
  1. Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome
  2. The Roman Triumph
  3. 10.1080/00335639109383960
  4. 10.1080/00335639509384111
  5. A Rhetoric of Motives
  6. 10.1080/00335639709384169
  7. 10.1080/10570310500076684
  8. 10.1017/S0017383500025213
  9. On Collective Memory
  10. 10.1177/0163443707080539
  11. 10.1080/00335639809384211
  12. 10.1353/par.2011.0010
  13. 10.1017/S0075435800064182
  14. Diocletian and the Tetrarchy
  15. 10.1080/00335630.2012.691173
  16. Representations
  17. Triumphus: An Inquiry into the Origin, Development and Meaning of the Roman Triumph
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →