Tied to a Tree: Culture and Self-Reflexivity

Abstract

Comparative rhetoricians are heavily involved in textual interpretation, and the quality of the interpretation largely depends on how self-reflexive the interpreter is. However, within the disciplines of textual studies there is little specific guidance on how to improve self-reflexivity. This essay is intended to ameliorate this situation by drawing on and synthesizing the relevant literatures from such areas as cultural anthropology, qualitative research, and critical theory. I begin by outlining the disputes over the concept of self-reflexivity. I then move to the different spheres that have been proposed for self-reflexivity; these spheres range from accidents of individual psychology to historical circumstances to webs of power and privilege. Next I describe the most useful techniques for refining self-reflexivity, mapping out their theoretical and practical complexities. Throughout the essay I pull from my work on traditional Chinese rhetoric for cautionary examples. I conclude with some words of warning and of encouragement.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2013-05-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2013.792693
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (1)

  1. College English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/1354221
  2. The Logic of Practice
  3. 10.2307/303586
  4. 10.1177/146879410200200205
  5. 10.1023/A:1007747017533
  6. 10.2307/3822971
  7. 10.1177/00113921030512007
  8. 10.1177/009770049802400206
    Modern China  
  9. 10.1177/107780040100700103
  10. 10.1177/00380385030373002
  11. 10.1353/anq.0.0005
  12. 10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.805
CrossRef global citation count: 19 View in citation network →