Sick Stuff: A Case Study of Controversy in a Constitutive Attitude

Peter Cramer Simon Fraser University

Abstract

Journalists contribute in many routine ways to public controversies, ways that are often overlooked in traditional criticism. They have tended to be overlooked in part because of the agonistic argument dialogue that functions as a tacit, a priori location for controversy, and in part because of the tendency of traditional critics to treat news texts as reflections of controversy rather than contributions to it. This essay examines in detail journalists' entextualization and recontextualization of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's discourse from a press conference on September 22, 1999 in order to explain one way that they contributed to the Brooklyn Museum controversy. The analysis adopts a constitutive attitude toward controversy, asking how our habits of talking and writing contribute to our impressions of a controversy as an autonomous cultural phenomenon.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2013-03-01
DOI
10.1080/02773945.2013.768352
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0957926510392119
  2. 10.1017/CBO9780511610295
  3. 10.1080/00335638709383799
  4. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00746.x
    Journal of Communication  
  5. 10.1080/00335638409383707
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  6. Controversy as News Discourse
  7. Outrage! Art, Controversy, and Society
  8. Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analyses of Rhetorical Talk and Text
  9. 10.1215/01642472-19-2_67-127
  10. The Handbook of Rhetoric and Public Address.
  11. 10.1080/10570310109374704
    Western Journal of Communication  
  12. 10.1080/00335639209383991
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  
  13. 10.1080/00335638909383868
  14. 10.1080/10570319909374655
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →