Abstract

Abstract This article examines theoretical premises of the historical study of rhetorical women, epistemological confusions caused by postmodernism, and challenges from the studies of black and Third World rhetorical women. On that basis it points out that the present difficulties in accepting discursive feminist methodologies in the study of rhetorical history are direct results of a continued adherence to certain established interpretive frameworks that dominate inquiry and knowledge construction in the field of rhetoric/composition.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2002-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940209391222
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. College English
  4. College English
  5. College English
Show all 8 →
  1. College English
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. College English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/14672715.1999.10415728
    Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars  
  2. 10.1086/494426
  3. 10.1086/495479
  4. 10.2307/378936
  5. 10.1080/00335639809384220
  6. 10.2307/378977
  7. Writing Women's History: International Perspectives.
  8. 10.1017/CBO9780511625404.012
  9. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change among African American Women.
  10. Reclaiming Rhetorica
  11. 10.1353/jowh.2010.0551
    Journal of Women's History  
  12. 10.1353/jowh.2010.0461
    Journal of Women's History  
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →