Abstract

Abstract This study offers scholars in composition and communication studies an opportunity to reflect on the relationship between feminists and rhetoric in the context of edited collections. The author first recasts recovery and gender critique as inventive arts for editors, and then analyzes a selection of edited collections' framing texts to demonstrate how editors compose their collections by mediating these arts. This work reveals that an early either/or relationship between the arts of recovery and gender critique gives way to a both/and approach that opens possibilities for multiple, rich avenues of inquiry in feminist rhetorical studies.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2006-01-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2501_2
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓
  1. Lerner, Gerda. Why History Matters: Life and Thought. New York: Oxford UP, 1997.
  2. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjt73.5
    Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition. Ed. Andrea Lunsford. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P  
  3. Sutherland, Christine Mason. Afterword. The Changing Tradition: Women in the History of Rhetoric. Ed. Christi…
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →