Abstract

Composition-rhetoric is experiencing a surge in research examining how the material is rhetorically consequential, sometimes termed new materialism. However, much of this research is future-oriented, leaving intact traditional disciplinary values. This article offers a hauntological re-reading of our disciplinary history from a materialist perspective wherein we are always-already material. By examining three canonical articles where the original research is haunted by the rhetoricity of matter, the field’s traditional history and, concomitantly, current-future identities are left radically open and unsettled. New adjacent possibilities are available for realization only if/when we render our past-present-future selves unfamiliar.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2020-04-02
DOI
10.1080/07350198.2020.1727079
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. College English

Cites in this index (9)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Written Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 16 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
  2. 10.3366/drt.2010.0206
  3. 10.1215/10407391-1892943
  4. 10.1215/9780822391623
  5. 10.26818/9780814213803
  6. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjt92
  7. 10.1215/9780822392996
  8. 10.2307/357078
  9. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjng7
  10. 10.7330/9781607328933.c015
  11. 10.1080/00335630.2015.995925
  12. 10.1093/oso/9780195121049.001.0001
  13. 10.4324/9780203481141
  14. 10.2307/357540
  15. 10.2307/j.ctt5hjqwx
  16. 10.2307/j.ctv6wgmmq
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network →