Abstract

Abstract Whereas the postcritical conversation about student resistance often adopts a political or psychological perspective, this article argues for a rhetorical approach to understanding why students may resist the imperatives forwarded by critical pedagogies. Through an analysis of two cultural studies readers, this article suggests that we examine critical composition courses as pedagogical arguments that ask students to accept (and even embody) certain enthymematic messages about their subjectivity that they may be unable or unwilling to help construct, thus resulting in apparent resistance.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2006-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2504_4
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Pedagogy

References (17) · 1 in this index

  1. Alcorn, Marshall. Changing the Subject in English Class. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2002.
  2. Aristotle. On Rhetoric. Trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford UP, 1991.
  3. Berlin, James. "Composition Studies and Cultural Studies: Collapsing Boundaries." Into the Field: The Site of…
  4. Rhetoric Review 11
  5. 10.1080/00335635909382374
    Quarterly Journal of Speech 45  
Show all 17 →
  1. 10.2307/358930
    College Composition and Communication 49  
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. George, Diana, and John Trimbur, eds. Reading Culture. 5th ed. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2004.
  4. 10.2307/375907
  5. 10.2307/357563
    College Composition and Communication 43  
  6. 10.2307/3594203
    College Composition and Communication 55  
  7. Langstraat, Lisa. "Gender Literacy in the Cultural Studies Composition Classroom: `Fashioning' the `Self' thr…
  8. Composition Forum 7
  9. Maasik, Sonia, and Jack Solomon, eds. Signs of Life in the U.S.A. 4th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2003.
  10. PRE/TEXT 13.
  11. Vitanza, Victor. "Three Countertheses: Or, A Critical In(ter)vention into Composition Theories and Pedagogies…
  12. JAC 19