Abstract

Contrary to a prevailing view within rhetoric and composition circles that finds a positive view of rhetoric in the Phaedrus, I contend that Plato mockingly denounces rhetoric in the Phaedrus. To support this claim, I argue that the Phaedrus is an unmistakable response to Isocrates' Against the Sophists and needs to be understood as part of this dynamic dialogue and that in the Phaedrus Plato is distinguishing his philosophical method, as he conceives it, from Isocrates' pseudo-philosophical method (as conceived by Plato). I provide parallels between Against the Sophists and the Phaedrus and then explain the distinction between Isocrates' and Plato's respective conceptions of what the philosopher is and should do and between each writer's philosophical method.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2004-01-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2301_2
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Philosophy & Rhetoric
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1353/hph.2008.1134
    Journal of the History of Philosophy 9.4 (Oct.  
  2. 10.1080/10510978209388441
    Central States Speech Journal 33.2 (Summer  
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →