Abstract

Abstract Sound doctoral pedagogy, in addition to other forms of professionalization in PhD work, is essential in nurturing future generations of scholars in composition and rhetoric. Using the comprehensive exam as a focal point, this article identifies absences and contradictions in the field's approach to evaluating the competency of doctoral students.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
2003-10-01
DOI
10.1207/s15327981rr2204_4
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (3)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. College English
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Applebee, Arthur N. Curriculum as Conversation: Transforming Traditions of Teaching and Learning. Chicago: U …
  2. Bowen, William G., and Neil L. Rudenstine. In Pursuit of the PhD. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992.
  3. Connors, Robert J. Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1997.
  4. Damrosch, David. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1995.
  5. Geiger, Roger. "Research, Graduate Education, and the Ecology of American Universities." The European and Ame…
  6. 10.1080/00091383.1974.10568727
    Change  
  7. 10.2307/378649
    College English  
  8. 10.2307/358862
    College Composition and Communication 50.3 (  
CrossRef global citation count: 21 View in citation network →