Critical sub/versions of the history of philosophical rhetoric

Victor J. Vitanza The University of Texas at Arlington

Abstract

I think that, as rhetoricians and writing teachers, we will come of age and become autonomous professionals with a discipline of our own only if we can make a psychological break with the literary critics who today dominate the profession of English studies... [Already] we've left home in many ways, but we haven't cut the cord.... For example: We keep trying to find ways to join contemporary literary theory with composition theory. -Maxine Hairston, Breaking Bonds and Reaffirming Our Connections, CCC 36 (1985): 273-74.

Journal
Rhetoric Review
Published
1987-09-01
DOI
10.1080/07350198709359152
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Show all 10 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Rhetoric Review
  4. Rhetoric Review
  5. Rhetoric Review

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. College Composition and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.4324/9780203328439
  2. 10.1525/9780520341715
  3. 10.4159/harvard.9780674331457
  4. 10.1080/00335637509383307
  5. Grice Paul . “Logic and Conversation.” . Edited by: Cole and Morgan . 41 – 58 .
  6. 10.2307/357846
  7. 10.1080/00335637609383320
  8. 10.7208/chicago/9780226056210.001.0001
  9. 10.1080/03637758409390196
  10. 10.1086/448273
  11. 10.1017/CBO9780511897887
  12. 10.1080/00335637509383306
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →