Speculative Usability

Nathaniel Rivers ; Lars Söderlund Western Oregon University

Abstract

This article introduces Speculative Usability. Whereas traditional models of usability rely on the salient features of an object–user relationship focused around the uses for which the object was designed, the goal of Speculative Usability is to notice an object as it interacts with other objects (in addition to but including human users) and to be vulnerable to an object’s unintended effects. The payoff of this speculative approach is an increased inventional capacity for usability testing.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2016-01-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281615600635
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 10 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Cites in this index (11)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 11 →
  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001
  2. 10.1525/9780520341715
  3. 10.1080/00201749208602296
  4. 10.1002/9781118241912
  5. 10.1109/TPC.2007.908730
  6. 10.1109/TSE.2007.70741
  7. 10.4159/9780674039964
  8. 10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001
  9. 10.1145/2666216.2666222
  10. 10.1109/COMPSAC.2009.26
  11. 10.1080/17530350903064204
  12. 10.1109/47.44542
  13. 10.1109/UsARE.2012.6226790
  14. 10.1109/CICSyN.2011.23
  15. 10.1017/CBO9780511509605
  16. 10.1109/47.44537
  17. 10.1109/IPCC.1994.347535
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1530-4
  19. 10.1145/2466489.2466494
CrossRef global citation count: 23 View in citation network →