Engaging complexity in usability through assemblage

Gregory Zobel Western Oregon University

Abstract

In 2011, I faced a complex research problem: how could mobile device user experience (HCMVX) of visitors to Humboldt County, California, be measured and improved? Mobile visitors are visitors who actively use their smart mobile devices, like smart phones and iPads but not laptops, while on vacation. In 2011, there were no official records or policies regarding mobile visitors and little local awareness of mobile tourism in Humboldt County. No one had measured mobile visitors' experience in Humboldt County and few officials had any idea on how to improve these visitors' experiences. This information and policy gap also meant there was no clear way to contact mobile visitors or arrange for mobile usability tests. I faced a complex system with no clear starting point. Traditional usability methods did not initially help because the majority of usability methods rely on clearly identified users, tasks, or goals. While I planned to use traditional usability methods once the users and usability problem(s) were identified, it was necessary to first locate and identify the users and their tasks and goals. Using Deleuze's assemblage concept, I approached the complex system of HCMVX, identified potential points of engagement, conducted field research and interviews, analyzed, and wrote up my results in less than six months. Local officials took my results and reshaped part of their policies and merchant training based on my data and conclusion. Deleuze's assemblage offers usability practitioners a means to approach complex systems and rapidly identify points of engagement.

Journal
Communication Design Quarterly
Published
2013-04-01
DOI
10.1145/2466489.2466494
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Gold
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (33) · 1 in this index

  1. M. Albers & B
  2. Redish J. C. & Scholtz J. 2007. Evaluating complex information systems for domain experts. Paper presented at…
  3. M. Albers & M
  4. 10.5555/2835547.2835548
  5. Albers as cited in {1}. Albers as cited in {1}.
Show all 33 →
  1. 10.5555/1457597
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. M. Albers & B
  4. Redish and Scholtz cited in {2}. Redish and Scholtz cited in {2}.
  5. Dilger B. 2006. Extreme usability. In J. B. Scott B. Longo and K. V. Wills (Eds.) Critical Power Tools 47--69…
  6. 10.5555/2835572.2835576
  7. Redish and Scholtz cited in {2}. Redish and Scholtz cited in {2}.
  8. 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00008-4
  9. Redish cited in {4}. Redish cited in {4}.
  10. 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.06.004
  11. De Landa M. 2006. A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York: Continuum I…
  12. 10.1080/14759550412331297147
  13. Palmås K. 2007. Deleuze and DeLanda: A new ontology a new political economy? Paper presented at the Economic …
  14. Deleuzian Interrogations: A Conversation with Manuel DeLanda, John Protevi & Torkild Than…
    Journal for Critical Postmodern Organization, 4(4). Retrieved from http://www.dif-ferance.org/Delanda-Protevi.pdf
  15. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
  16. Deleuze & Guattari cited in {19}. Deleuze & Guattari cited in {19}.
  17. Buchanan I. 2000. Deleuzism: a metacommentary. Durham: Duke University Press. Buchanan I. 2000. Deleuzism: a…
  18. Spinuzzi as cited in {6}. Spinuzzi as cited in {6}.
  19. Spinuzzi as cited in {6}. Spinuzzi as cited in {6}.
  20. Still as cited in {8}. Still as cited in {8}.
  21. 10.1177/001872089203400407
  22. Nielsen J. & Landauer T. K. 1993. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Paper presented …
  23. Howard as cited in {11}. Howard as cited in {11}.
  24. Still as cited in in {8}. Still as cited in in {8}.
  25. Tullis T. & Albert W. 2008. Measuring the user experience: collecting analyzing and presenting usability metr…
  26. 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.04.004
  27. Brooke J. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189--194. Retrieved f…
  28. Finstad as cited in {31}. Finstad as cited in {31}.