Abstract

In Rwanda, apologies for crimes committed during the 1994 genocide were documented on the “Record of Confession, Guilty Plea, Repentance and Apology.” Unfortunately, a gap exists in our understanding of that document. This paper addresses that gap via a cultural approach to technical communication research that examines what was recorded, why, and how it shaped the public record. The paper concludes with suggested areas in which technical communication scholars can provide additional insight on apologies for wrongdoing.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2013.780963
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 8 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/0967010607086823
  2. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.007
  3. 10.1093/afraf/adh007
  4. 10.1109/TPC.2007.897605
  5. 10.1353/jmh.2006.0239
  6. 10.1080/10510979509368439
  7. 10.2307/378062
  8. 10.1017/S0021855306000106
  9. 10.1001/jama.292.5.602
  10. 10.1017/S0221855301001675
  11. The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments
  12. 10.1525/tph.2001.23.3.9
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →