Abstract

Through a retrospective examination of three case studies, this article argues for an open, contextualized approach to evaluating student learning using wikis. First, the project should be grounded in habits of thought appropriate for the field. Next, the class activity should give students the responsibility for putting these habits into practice. Finally, assessment should be distributed among a range of stakeholders and should be contextualized to give value to students’ work beyond the classroom.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2012-01-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2012.626756
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. College Composition and Communication
Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. What we really value: Beyond rubrics in teaching and assessing writing
  2. Organic writing assessment: Dynamic criteria mapping in action
  3. 10.37514/LLD-J.2003.6.1.02
    Language & Learning across the Disciplines  
  4. The foraging spectrum: Diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways
  5. 10.37514/ATD-J.2009.6.1.01
    Across the Disciplines  
  6. Composition in convergence: The impact of new media on writing assessment
  7. Teaching and evaluating writing in the age of computers and high-stakes testing
  8. 10.2307/358862
    College Composition and Communication  
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →