Abstract

This article describes how disability studies can be used in a medical and science writing class to critically examine the assumptions of scientific discourse. An emerging, interdisciplinary field, disability studies draws on feminist, postmodern, and post‐colonial theory and extends their critiques to the medicalization of disability. Deconstructing the medical model of disability helps students understand how science is socially constructed. After conceptualizing disability studies, this essay discusses sample disability‐related classroom activities, readings, and writing assignments.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2000-03-01
DOI
10.1080/10572250009364691
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/1354221
  2. 10.2307/378619
  3. 10.1056/NEJM199905133401906
  4. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics.
  5. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.
  6. The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability.
CrossRef global citation count: 20 View in citation network →