Abstract

This article examines how normative assumptions about disability, family, and care perpetuate barriers to social services in cross-cultural contexts. It reports on an 8-month case study of how a county-sponsored, person-centered disability grant targeted but failed to meet the needs of Somali applicants. I identify four impasses that alienated applicants and demonstrated the grant's process relied on culture norms, including medical definitions of disability, institutional expertise, and normalization of self-sufficiency. I develop three recommendations for future technical communication and policy interventions. This study offers insights into how person-centered initiatives can engage the contexts and expertise of diverse users within institutional structures.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2019-10-01
DOI
10.1177/0047281619871212
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Written Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 10 works outside this index ↓
  1. Annamalai A. (2014). Culturally appropriate care. In Refugee health care (pp. 13–18). New York, NY: Springer.
  2. 10.1007/s10903-010-9337-5
  3. 10.5744/rhm.2018.1002
  4. Heilker, P. & Yergeau, M. (2011). Autism, rhetoric, and whiteness. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32, 4. Retri…
  5. 10.5406/illinois/9780252038372.001.0001
  6. 10.1145/3131201.3131203
    Communication Design Quarterly  
  7. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2656698
  8. 10.1145/3131201.3131207
  9. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744763.001.0001
  10. 10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1667
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →