Abstract

Although a growing body of research recognizes the importance of viewing argumentation as a means of understanding rather than combating others, little is known about how teachers cultivate this practice in classroom conversations when teaching argumentation. This study examines how argument can be taught in classroom discourse with an empathizing stance and generates associated pedagogical constructs. Adopting a microethnographic approach to discourse analysis, this study examines the key instructional events in an argumentative writing unit in two high school English language arts classes. The analysis demonstrates that the empathizing stance is introduced in the relationship between arguers and their warrants and the differences existing between arguers. It also generates four pedagogical constructs related to the teaching of argument with the stance: (1) identifying the connection between arguers’ warrants and backgrounds; (2) transposing oneself into others’ backgrounds; (3) exploring interlocutors’ common and divergent grounds; and (4) situating argument in a broader context. It concludes with a discussion of the affordances of teaching argument with an empathizing stance.

Journal
Research in the Teaching of English
Published
2024-05-01
DOI
10.58680/rte2024584405
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Research in the Teaching of English
  2. Written Communication
  3. Research in the Teaching of English
  4. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 25 works outside this index ↓
  1. Toward a consistent stance in teaching for equity: Learning to advocate for lesbian-and g…
    Teaching and Teacher Education  
  2. “When anybody speaks, we all need to be involved”: Classroom conditions that support dial…
    Theory into Practice  
  3. Mitigating myside bias in argumentation
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  4. Less arguing, more listening: Improving civility in classrooms
    Phi Delta Kappan  
  5. An updated theoretical and practical model for promoting historical empathy
    Social Studies Research and Practice  
  6. Studying the over-time construction of knowledge in educational settings: A microethnogra…
    Review of Research in Education  
  7. Identity, community, and learning lives in the digital age
  8. Discourse strategies
  9. Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction
    English Journal  
  10. Teaching argumentation with a dialogic stance: A case of an 11th-grade English language a…
    Learning, Culture and Social Interaction  
  11. Patterns of peer talk in consensus-oriented classrooms: Deliberative argumentation or rus…
    Learning, Culture and Social Interaction  
  12. Argumentation tasks in secondary English language arts, history, and science: Variations …
    Reading Research Quarterly  
  13. Coding empathy in dialogue
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  14. t’s not about being right: Developing argument through debate
    Journal of Literacy Research  
  15. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach
  16. Teaching and learning argumentative writing in high school English language arts classrooms
  17. Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curr…
    Teaching and Teacher Education  
  18. Applying Toulmin: Teaching logical reasoning and argumentative writing
    English Journal  
  19. Looking inward and outward: Fostering introspective argumentation
    English Journal  
  20. Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence
    Current Directions in Psychological Science  
  21. The uses of argument
  22. Making others’ perspectives present: Arguments that listen
    English Journal  
  23. Taming the warrant in Toulmin’s model of argument
    English Journal  
  24. Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education
  25. The social construction of warranting evidence in two classrooms
    Journal of Literacy Research  
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →