Functional Complexity and Web Site Design

Abstract

Functional complexity is a widespread and underresearched phenomenon in Web sites. This article explores a specific case of functional complexity by analyzing the content of UNESCO World Heritage Web sites, which have to meet demands from both World Heritage and tourism perspectives. Based on a functional analysis, a content checklist was developed and used to evaluate a sample of 30 World Heritage Web sites. The results show that World Heritage Web sites generally fall short in all content categories. A cluster analysis reveals three types of World Heritage Web sites based on their emphasis on World Heritage content versus tourism content: (a) less well-developed Web sites (no emphasis), (b) Web sites of World Heritage Sites with touristic possibilities (emphasis on World Heritage), and (c) Web sites of touristic attractions with outstanding cultural or natural value (emphasis on tourism). In all, the findings show that functional complexity poses serious threats to the exhaustiveness of a Web site’s information and that evaluation approaches based on functional analysis can be useful in detecting blindspots in the content provided.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651918762029
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 37 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1186/s13673-015-0040-3
  2. 10.1080/09669580408667225
  3. 10.1109/47.968105
  4. 10.1080/09669582.2014.978787
  5. 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365966
  6. 10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.007
  7. 10.1109/47.867941
  8. 10.1002/jtr.297
  9. 10.1080/09669582.2014.998678
  10. 10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00094-8
  11. 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003
  12. 10.1016/j.tmp.2012.12.002
  13. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.009
  14. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.01.014
  15. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.011
  16. 10.1080/09669582.2013.864660
  17. 10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00090-5
  18. 10.1515/9783110926835
  19. 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.05.016
  20. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.006
  21. 10.1016/j.tourman.2007.03.013
  22. 10.1108/20441261211223289
  23. 10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.005
  24. 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.02.018
  25. 10.1260/2047-4970.1.0.101
  26. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.031
  27. 10.1177/0047287512465959
  28. 10.1007/s10109-013-0184-5
  29. 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.02.011
  30. Discourse analysis and evaluation: Functional approaches
  31. 10.1080/10598650.2013.11510774
  32. 10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365998
  33. 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.04.005
  34. 10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002
  35. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.06.009
  36. 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.008
  37. 10.1080/13683500.2014.912204
CrossRef global citation count: 12 View in citation network →