The Professional Work of “Unprofessional” Tweets

Douglas M. Walls North Carolina State University

Abstract

This article examines the tactical online rhetorical choices of a young African American professional communicator, Gina. Drawing on situated analysis to show how Gina engaged with her African American Hush Harbor (AAHH) of young professionals online, the author argues that Gina used Twitter to maintain professional network ties in her AAHH community while resisting organizational discourses of surveillance. The author further argues that analyzing particular choices in boundaryless career situations allows us to see important nontask-based professional writing activity.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2017-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651917713195
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. College Composition and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1002/job.4030150402
  2. 10.4135/9781446218327
  3. 10.1002/job.290
  4. 10.1177/0095798414550864
  5. 10.1080/08838151.2012.732147
  6. 10.4135/9781412985833
  7. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176247.001.0001
  8. Nardi B. A., Whittaker S., Schwarz H. (2000, 5 1). It’s not what you know it’s who you know [text]. Retrieved…
  9. 10.4324/9780203366905
  10. 10.37514/PER-B.2003.2317.2.01
  11. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
  12. 10.4018/ijskd.2013100103
  13. 10.5810/kentucky/9780813124339.001.0001
  14. Control through communication: The rise of system in American management
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →