Abstract

With their timely, interactive nature and wide public access, social media have provided a new platform that empowers stakeholders and corporations to interact in crisis communication. This study investigates crisis communication strategies and stakeholders’ emotions in response to a real corporate crisis—the crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214—in order to enhance our understanding of socially mediated crisis communication. The authors examine 8,530 responses from Chinese stakeholders to crisis communication on the Chinese microblogging Web site Sina Weibo. Their findings suggest that the integrated use of accommodative and defensive communication strategies in the early stage of postcrisis communication prevented escalation of the crisis.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2016-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651916651907
Open Access
OA PDF Green
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00909882.2012.654498
  2. 10.1016/0147-1767(86)90035-0
  3. 10.1108/14684521111113579
  4. 10.1080/10627260802557506
  5. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_02
  6. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049
  7. 10.1177/089331802237233
  8. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003
  9. 10.1192/bjp.143.5.487
  10. 10.1177/0022002187018001007
  11. 10.1086/426612
  12. 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.002
  13. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.008
  14. 10.1080/10350330.2012.739000
  15. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0802_01
  16. 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
  17. 10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00070-5
  18. 10.1177/0093650206287077
  19. 10.1177/0093650210368256
  20. 10.1177/0093650211423918
  21. 10.1080/1062726X.2012.676747
  22. 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
  23. 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
  24. 10.1177/0093650210385813
  25. 10.1086/209256
  26. 10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001
  27. 10.1177/0093650204267936
  28. 10.1111/1467-9280.01433
  29. 10.1080/026999300402763
  30. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
  31. 10.1145/2463728.2463777
  32. 10.1057/9780230554580_9
  33. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1603_1
  34. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.04.004
  35. 10.1215/07402775-2006-1003
  36. 10.1177/1461444812452411
  37. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.10.001
  38. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.12.004
  39. 10.1080/00909880601065722
  40. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.001
  41. 10.1126/science.3563507
  42. 10.1177/0893318994007003004
  43. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.02.018
  44. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.12.001
  45. 10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465
  46. 10.1111/jcom.12058
CrossRef global citation count: 28 View in citation network →