Abstract

This study examines the corporate environmental reports of 100 companies listed in the 2009 Fortune 1000 in order to illustrate how this type of genre communicates a green corporate ethos to audience members who are trying to distinguish between greenwashing tactics and true environmental concerns. The authors analyze how corporate environmental reports are constructed at macro and micro discursive levels to promote a socially responsible image to in-group (e.g., employees and stockholders) and out-group (e.g., consumers) members. The results of the analysis show how these reports use ideological persuasion to influence or change audience members’ opinions about corporate environmental sustainability.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2012-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651912448872
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (6)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (59) · 1 in this index

  1. Alcoa. (2010). Sustainability report. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.alcoa.com/sustainability/en/pd…
  2. 10.1007/s10551-008-9806-0
  3. 10.1108/EUM0000000007299
  4. Environmental management and development
  5. 10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00146-0
Show all 59 →
  1. 10.1016/S0007-6813(00)80018-X
  2. Shaping written knowledge
  3. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings
  4. 10.1002/pf.2207
  5. Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view
  6. 10.1075/scl.28
  7. 10.1108/13632540310807430
  8. 10.1177/002194369703400408
  9. 10.1108/13632540110806811
  10. 10.1007/s10551-005-1953-y
  11. 10.1108/07363769710185999
  12. 10.1177/0021943608317111
  13. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  14. 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8
  15. 10.1177/0957926593004002002
  16. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach
  17. 10.1007/s10551-006-9277-0
  18. 10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00074-0
  19. Green H. (2008, December 12). The greening of the corporation. Business Week Online. Retrieved July 10, 2009,…
  20. Professional discourse
  21. An introduction to functional grammar
  22. On grammar
  23. 10.5040/9781474211970
  24. 10.2979/gls.2004.11.2.205
  25. Hertz. (2010). Green initiatives report. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from https://images.hertz.com/pdfs/green_in…
  26. Language as ideology
  27. 10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00085-6
  28. ITT. (2009). Global citizenship executive summary. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://itt.com/_docs/citizen…
  29. 10.1075/scl.28.04kan
  30. Kraft Foods. (2010). Creating a more delicious world. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.kraftfoodscomp…
  31. 10.1023/A:1022962719299
  32. 10.1177/002194369903600101
  33. 10.1177/002194360103800105
  34. 10.1177/1086026602153001
  35. Mincer J. (2008, October 6). The color of money: Sustainability has become more than abuzzword among corporat…
  36. 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00006.x
  37. 10.1108/13632540910951768
  38. 10.1080/00221546.2006.11778934
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00440.x
  40. 10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00061-6
  41. Green marketing
  42. 10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2
  43. PPG. (2008). Corporate sustainability report. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.ppg.com/en/corporatesu…
  44. 10.1108/eb039673
  45. Sara Lee. (2010). Sustainability report. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.saralee.com/en/Sustainabili…
  46. 10.1362/0267257053779154
  47. 10.1177/0021943607313989
  48. 10.1002/bse.599
  49. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
  50. 10.1007/s10551-008-9890-1
  51. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach
  52. 10.1007/s10551-008-9731-2
  53. Principles of corporate communication
  54. 10.1111/j.0045-3609.2004.00002.x