Designing From Data: Rhetorical Appeals in Support of Design Decisions

Erin Friess University of North Texas

Abstract

This case study investigates how a group of novice technical communicators used appeals to support their design decisions during group meetings. The results of this ethnographic study suggest that although these technical communicators were well acquainted with user-centered design (UCD) concepts and claimed to actively practice UCD, their appeals often did not reference data collected within user-centered research and instead referenced designer-centric appeals to support their claims. This group’s overall use of appeals to support their design decisions suggests that more empirical study into UCD theory and practice as well as students’ argumentation skills is warranted.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651910371197
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (5)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Written Communication
Also cites 35 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1007/s00163-002-0023-z
  2. 10.1109/TPC.1981.6447819
  3. 10.1080/00223980.1956.9713040
  4. 10.1080/00028533.1997.11978016
  5. 10.1177/009365094021005002
  6. Narratives in popular culture, media, and everyday life
  7. 10.1353/par.2001.0012
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
  9. 10.1007/978-3-322-99786-9_1
  10. 10.1016/j.destud.2004.10.003
  11. 10.1201/9780203485088
  12. 10.1080/03637758509376117
  13. 10.1145/357442.357443
  14. 10.1145/3166.3170
  15. 10.1177/108056990206500404
  16. 10.1080/03637757809375950
  17. 10.1080/00335638009383524
  18. 10.1145/97435.97990
  19. Reader feedback in text design: Validity of the plus-minus method for the pretesting of p…
  20. 10.1145/256175.256181
  21. 10.1017/CBO9780511571350
  22. 10.2307/2529786
  23. 10.1177/0002764202045006003
  24. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02975.x
  25. 10.1201/b15703
  26. 10.1080/10919399109540150
  27. 10.1080/10447318.2002.9669124
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
  29. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.1.81
  30. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00170.x
  31. 10.4135/9781412976046.n22
  32. 10.4135/9781446250228.n4
  33. 10.1080/08886504.2001.10782312
  34. 10.1145/97435.97988
  35. 10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.436
CrossRef global citation count: 18 View in citation network →