Abstract

Abstract This article reports results from a survey of US technical and professional communication undergraduate programs concerning core concepts emphasized and most commonly taught procedures, skills, and tools. Snapshot views of current programs are derived from the results, and the developmental processes and directions of four new programs are described in more detail. The article concludes with challenges for programs to maintain humanistic concerns while also providing effective professional and technical preparation.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2004-04-01
DOI
10.1207/s15427625tcq1302_3
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (24)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Communication Design Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Communication Design Quarterly
  5. Communication Design Quarterly
Show all 24 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Technical Communication Quarterly
  8. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly
  10. Technical Communication Quarterly
  11. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  12. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  13. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  14. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  15. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  16. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  17. Technical Communication Quarterly
  18. Technical Communication Quarterly
  19. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

References (25) · 2 in this index

  1. Barker, Carol M. "Liberal Arts Education for a Global Society." New York: Carnegie Corp., 2000.
  2. Borden, Gloria J., Katherine S. Harris, and Lawrence J. Raphael. Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics…
  3. Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. 1945. Berkeley: U California P, 1969.
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Dubinsky, James M. "A Couple of Qs." E-mail to Nancy Allen, 3 May 2003.
Show all 25 →
  1. 10.2307/359064
    College Composition and Communication 33.1 (  
  2. Grabill, Jeff. "Program Development Question." E-mail to Steve Benninghoff, 5 May 2003.
  3. Technical Communication 48.2 (
  4. -. "Program Development Question." E-mail to Steve Benninghoff, 5 May 2003.
  5. Editorial. Technical Communication 46.1 (
  6. CPTSC Proceedings
  7. Johnson, Robert R. User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts. A…
  8. Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. "In Accepting Our Position in These Systems, We Participate in Limiting Model of Com…
  9. McShane, Becky Jo. "Qs on Your Program." E-mail to Nancy Allen, 4 May 2003.
  10. 10.2307/375964
    College English  
  11. Parkinson, Richard, and Stephen Quirke. Papyrus. Austin: U Texas P, 1995.
  12. Porter, James E. "Program Research." E-mail to Steve Benninghoff, 3 Sept. 2003.
  13. Savage, Gerald J., and Dale Sullivan. Writing a Professional Life: Stories of Technical Communicators On and …
  14. Technical Communication Quarterly
  15. Shannon, Claude F., and Warren Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: U Illinois P, 1964.
  16. Simonson, Michael, Sharon E. Smaldino, Michael Albright, and Susan Zvacek. Teaching and Learning at a Distanc…
  17. Tognazzini, Bruce. "It's Time We Got Respect." Aug. 2003 <www.asktog.com/columns/ 057ItsTimeWeGotRespect.html>.
  18. Virginia Tech English Department Professional Writing. 2 May 2003 <pro.writing.vt.edu>.
  19. Weber State University. 5 May 2003 <departments.weber.edu/english/tw/tw_home.htm>.
  20. Technical Communication 47.4 (