Practitioner Research Instruction

Rachel Spilka University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee

Abstract

Most technical communication practitioners conduct research throughout their careers. Yet, a survey of the Web sites of 114 undergraduate technical communication programs between September 2006 and April 2007 revealed that 65% (about two thirds) of these programs are providing minimal or no exposure to research instruction and therefore are not sufficiently preparing students to handle the types of research they will encounter in their upcoming careers. Given the disconnect between the centrality of research in the work that technical communicators do and the low presence of research instruction at the undergraduate level, academics need to look for ways to overcome institutional and other constraints in order to give research training greater priority in their undergraduate programs.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2009-04-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651908328882
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 9 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (9)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Written Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 1 work outside this index ↓
  1. Community literacy programs and the politics of change
CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →