Abstract

This study investigates politeness strategies within meetings of designers who met face-to-face and technical communicators who met via teleconference and, more specifically, politeness strategies of existing members toward group newcomers and vice versa. Based on the results of this study, I suggest that issues of power and social distance affect politeness strategies by both groups during their initial interactions and suggest that technical communication educators should better prepare students by teaching benefits, detriments, and realities of particular linguistic politeness choices.

Journal
Technical Communication Quarterly
Published
2013-10-01
DOI
10.1080/10572252.2013.782261
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (12)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 12 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. Written Communication
Also cites 44 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1515/jplr.2010.004
  2. 10.1177/0038038597031003015
  3. 10.1177/001872679504800407
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  5. 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90020-3
  6. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00024.x
  7. Who's socializing whom? The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders, work groups, and…
    Human Resource Management Review  
  8. 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00017-9
  9. 10.1515/PR.2007.013
  10. 10.1080/00909889309365366
  11. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00100-5
  12. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246
  13. 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90080-W
  14. 10.1177/002194369803500401
  15. 10.1109/47.712348
  16. 10.1109/47.678552
  17. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00193.x
  18. 10.1109/TPC.2011.2172669
  19. 10.2307/2529786
  20. 10.1080/01638539409544870
  21. 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
  22. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.418
  23. 10.1177/009365095022001003
  24. 10.1080/10510979609368460
  25. 10.2307/258608
  26. 10.1287/orsc.7.5.544
  27. Morand D. A & Ocker R. J. ( 2003 ). Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: A sociolinguistic …
  28. 10.2307/256592
  29. 10.1177/030631291021001004
  30. 10.1080/01463370309370166
  31. 10.1002/job.4030120607
  32. Devising collective knowledges for the technical writing classroom: A course-based approa…
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication  
  33. Riley K. ( 2003 September ). About face: Comparing positive politeness in Dummies and conventional software d…
  34. 10.1109/TPC.2002.808352
  35. 10.1177/0146167209333177
  36. 10.1007/BF00148124
  37. 10.1007/BF02195895
  38. The dynamics of collaborative design
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication  
  39. 10.1017/S0047404500013890
  40. Collaborative writing in the workplace
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication  
  41. 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.016
  42. 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00049-8
  43. 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.003
  44. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00437.x
CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network →