Abstract

This commentary reflects on Mumby and Stohl's essay “Disciplining Organizational Communication Studies.” The author argues that Mumby and Stohl's desire to create a “birth” story for the discipline caused them to overlook two important trends among its scholars that may work to undermine the discipline's relevance: overvaluing theory relative to the empirical study of communication behavior and resisting technology both as a subject and a tool. Organizational communication scholars should work against tendencies to maintain the currency of their research enterprise.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2006-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651906287256
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/23808985.1993.11678856
  2. 10.1177/002194360304000202
  3. 10.1016/0378-8733(94)90003-5
  4. 10.1177/13505084030103002
  5. 10.1023/A:1020414109458
  6. 10.1007/978-3-540-39653-6_23
  7. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02652.x
  8. 10.1177/0893318996010001004
  9. 10.4135/9781412986243.n3
  10. 10.1007/978-1-349-25464-4_1
  11. 10.1080/23808985.2001.11678983
  12. 10.7208/chicago/9780226924908.001.0001
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →