Abstract

Despite the prevailing assumption that narrative and scientific discourse are incompatible genres, in this article the authors show that scientific texts typically follow a narrative pattern. This simple observation that narrative and scientific texts are similar is not all that surprising when we recognize that scientific discourse, like all narratives, describes what happened and what it meant. Indeed, scientific texts are almost always accounts of scientists' experiences in reality. After developing a vocabulary of narrative, the authors analyze the works of Newton and Einstein, using narrative analysis to illuminate scientific texts as stories.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1999-07-01
DOI
10.1177/105065199901300306
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (20)

  1. Novum Organum. Vol. 8 of The Works of Francis Bacon
  2. JBTC
  3. JBTC
  4. 10.4159/9780674029019
  5. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production
Show all 20 →
  1. 10.1002/andp.19053220607
    Annalen der Physik  
  2. The Rhetoric of Science
  3. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought
  4. Black-Body Theory and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894-1912
  5. Language in the Inner City
  6. The Postmodern Condition
  7. Metaphor and Myth in Science and Religion
  8. 10.1080/03637758709390221
  9. Opticks
  10. Principia
  11. Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences
  12. 10.1515/9783110838626
  13. 10.1017/CBO9781316534984.014
  14. 10.1080/00201749008602217
  15. Dreams of a Final Theory