Abstract

This article considers on-line documentation's place in a two-year college's technical communication program. Such a course can be successful if instructors (1) emphasize design principles rather than a particular software package; (2) build on rhetorical skills students already possess, while developing the new skills necessary for authoring documents for the computer screen; and (3) acknowledge the need for their own professional development.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1997-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651997011001005
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14) · 4 in this index

  1. Authorware. Vers. 3.5. Computer software. Macromedia, 1996. Windows 95, 3.1, 8MB RAM, Windows NT, 16MB RAM, C…
  2. Byte
  3. Technical Communication
  4. Communitec. Technical Communications Consulting Company. Ann Arbor, MI, 1995.
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 14 →
  1. Designing and Writing Online Documentation
  2. KnowledgePro Windows. Vers. 2.51. Computer software. Knowledge Garden, 1995. Windows 3.1x, 95, NT, 4MB RAM, disk.
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. PageMaker. Vers. 6.0. Computer software. Adobe Systems, 1995. Windows 95, 8MB RAM, Windows 3.1, 10 MB RAM, Ma…
  5. QuarkXPress. Vers. 3.32. Computer software. Quark, 1995. Windows 3.1, 95, Macintosh, 10 MB RAM, CD-ROM, disk.
  6. Technical Writing Teacher
  7. College English
  8. Toolbook. Vers. 3.0. Computer software. Asymetrix, 1995. Windows 3.1, 95, 4MB RAM, disk.
  9. Technical Communication Quarterly