Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of five leading grammar/style analysis software packages in analyzing business students' writing. The software exhibited considerable differences in the following areas: correctly identifying various mechanical and style errors, avoiding annoying and misleading false error messages, and providing helpful remedial advice. No prior research study has empirically compared grammar/style analysis software along all these important dimensions. PowerEdit was found to be the overall superior package, demonsrating proficiency in detecting errors in punctuation, sentence structure, passive voice, and weak wording. The results have significant implications for utilizing grammar/style analysis software to improve students' writing.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1995-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651995009003004
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (35) · 2 in this index

  1. 10.2307/357401
  2. 10.1177/0893318989002003003
  3. Issues in Accounting Education
  4. JBTC
  5. Correct Grammar® for Windows™. Vers. 2.0.
Show all 35 →
  1. PC Week
  2. Editor. Vers. 4.0.
  3. BYTE
  4. 10.1177/107769589304700403
  5. Grammatik™. Vers. 5.
  6. Educator
  7. Word Perfect: The Magazine
  8. Research in the Teaching of English
  9. 10.1177/002194368201900102
  10. 10.1177/108056998905200404
  11. 10.1177/108056999105400211
  12. Classroom Computer Learning
  13. 10.1002/pfi.4170310910
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. 10.1177/002194368702400406
  16. Power Edit™. Vers. 2.0.
  17. PC Magazine
  18. 10.1177/002194368001700403
  19. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal
  20. RightWriter®. Vers. 6.0.
  21. PC Week
  22. 10.1177/108056999105400212
  23. Business Education Forum
  24. Personal Computing
  25. Technical Communication
  26. PC Computing
  27. Computers and Composition
  28. 10.1177/002194368602300104
  29. Human Relations Research
  30. 10.1177/002194369102800204