Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of five leading grammar/style analysis software packages in analyzing business students' writing. The software exhibited considerable differences in the following areas: correctly identifying various mechanical and style errors, avoiding annoying and misleading false error messages, and providing helpful remedial advice. No prior research study has empirically compared grammar/style analysis software along all these important dimensions. PowerEdit was found to be the overall superior package, demonsrating proficiency in detecting errors in punctuation, sentence structure, passive voice, and weak wording. The results have significant implications for utilizing grammar/style analysis software to improve students' writing.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
1995-07-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651995009003004
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
Also cites 12 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.2307/357401
  2. 10.1177/0893318989002003003
  3. 10.1177/107769589304700403
  4. 10.1177/002194368201900102
  5. 10.1177/108056998905200404
  6. 10.1177/108056999105400211
  7. 10.1002/pfi.4170310910
  8. 10.1177/002194368702400406
  9. 10.1177/002194368001700403
  10. 10.1177/108056999105400212
  11. 10.1177/002194368602300104
  12. 10.1177/002194369102800204
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →