Advancing the Knowledge Base on Effective Presentation Slide Design: Three Pilot Studies

Joanna Wolfe Carnegie Mellon University ; Nisha Shanmugaraj Carnegie Mellon University ; Juliann Reineke Carnegie Mellon University ; Laura Caton Peet Carnegie Mellon University ; Craig P. Moreau

Abstract

The cognitive theory of multimedia learning (CTML) describes a set of empirically tested principles that technical and professional communication research largely acknowledges as important to the design of presentation slides. However, presenters often run into difficulties understanding how to apply CTML principles to contexts in which it has not been tested. We present three pilot studies that extend our knowledge of how to apply CTML principles. Pilot study one suggests that CTML principles can be effective for presenting advanced research to expert audiences. Pilot study two highlights the importance of user testing nonessential images added primarily for visual interest, specifically finding that visual organizer images such as Microsoft PowerPoint's SmartArt, can backfire by unintentionally indicating imprecise relationships while adding little in terms of visual interest. Pilot study three suggests that, when needing to present a long quotation, presenters should avoid verbatim reading and consider abridging or paraphrasing the quotation.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2024-07-01
DOI
10.1177/00472816231169433
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

References (52) · 7 in this index

  1. 10.1037/a0026147
  2. The craft of scientific presentations
  3. Alley M., Schreiber M., Muffo J. (2005, October). Pilot testing of a new design for pre…
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Beyond bullet points: Using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2007 to create presentations that…
Show all 52 →
  1. 10.1177/1609406918786335
  2. 10.1300/J017v24n02_07
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (14 October 2019). Managing cognitive lo…
  5. 10.1007/BF01320076
  6. College Composition and Communication
  7. Donaldjo (30 April 2014). Effective narrated presentations . Ecam…
  8. 10.1002/acp.3513
  9. 10.1075/idj.14.2.08far
  10. International Journal of Engineering Education
  11. 10.18260/1-2--17510
  12. International Journal of Engineering Education
  13. 10.1145/2556325.2566239
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92
  15. Written Communication
  16. 10.1177/0092055X12444071
  17. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
  18. 10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03988.x
  20. 10.1177/0098628311421333
  21. 10.1007/s10648-007-9051-6
  22. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
  23. 10.1518/001872098779480587
  24. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  25. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  26. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  27. 10.1109/ICIT52682.2021.9491115
  28. 10.1002/tl.47
  29. Mayer R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cam…
  30. 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.187
  31. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  32. 10.1080/01638539609544975
  33. 10.5688/aj710116
  34. 10.1002/9781118796139
  35. Technical Communication
  36. Presentation zen: Simple ideas on presentation design and delivery
  37. Journal of Online Higher Education
  38. 10.1037/edu0000209
  39. 10.3390/vetsci8020013
  40. 10.2753/MER1052-8008210205
  41. 10.1007/s10648-020-09522-4
  42. 10.1023/A:1022193728205
  43. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.028
  44. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2
  45. 10.1109/FIE.2006.322455
  46. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.004
  47. 10.1037/a0031971