Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Jul 2003

Using New Technology to Assess the Academic Writing Styles of Male and Female Pairs and Individuals

James Hartley Keele University ; James W. Pennebaker The University of Texas at Austin ; Claire Fox

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that there are advantages to writing in groups or in pairs compared with writing individually, and that men write differently from women. However, as far as we know, no one has yet used new technology to assess published academic articles written in these different modes. Method: We assembled 80 papers from recent issues of the Journal of Educational Psychology as follows: 21 authored by individual men, 21 by individual women, 19 by pairs of men, and 19 by pairs of women. We then used two computer-based measures to assess various textual features of the Abstracts, the Introductions, and the Discussion sections of these 80 papers. Results: Several differences were found between these various parts of the journal articles (e.g., the Discussions were more readable than the Introductions and these in turn were more readable than the Abstracts). However, there were few differences between the writing of pairs or individuals, or between that of men and women. Conclusions: There was no real evidence to support the notion that writing in pairs would lead to better quality articles or that there would be differences between the readability of papers produced by men and women. Such differences may occur, however, before peer review.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 2003-07-01
DOI: 10.2190/9vpn-rrx9-g0uf-cj5x
Open Access: Closed
Topics: multimodality revision voice and style

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Thompson et al. (2006)

Women and Feminism in Technical Communication—An Update

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (6)

Hartley et al. (2003)

The Effects of Using Colored Paper to Boost Response-Rates to Surveys and Quest…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Hartley (1999)

From Structured Abstracts to Structured Articles: A Modest Proposal

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Rehling (1996)

Writing Together: Gender's Effect on Collaboration

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Rubin et al. (1992)

Gender-Typical Style in Written Language

Research in the Teaching of English
Lay (1989)

Interpersonal Conflict in Collaborative Writing: What We Can Learn from Gender …

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 6 →

O'DONNELL et al. (1985)

Cooperative Writing

Written Communication

Also cites 46 works outside this index ↓

10.1023/A:1014254214337

↗
10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0_6

↗
10.1007/978-1-4471-2007-0

↗
10.1007/BF02016697

↗
10.1177/030631278001000105

↗
10.2307/351577

↗
10.1177/053901847501400113

↗
10.1007/BF02016776

↗
10.1007/BF02019181

↗
10.1080/00220973.1993.9943862

↗
10.1007/BF00138870

↗
10.1037/0003-066X.36.5.524

↗
10.1177/0306312702032002005

↗
10.1007/978-1-4471-1482-6_12

↗
10.1093/swr/18.3.186

↗
10.1348/014466601164812

↗
10.1111/1467-9280.00329

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511581670

↗
10.1017/CBO9781139164771

↗
10.1016/0271-5309(94)90007-8

↗
10.1016/S1075-2935(96)90004-5

↗
10.1080/0141192910170204

↗
10.1080/0305498970230404

↗
10.2307/357697

↗
10.1080/03075070120076282

↗
10.1023/A:1025008802657

↗
10.1177/016555158801400202

↗
10.1037/h0057532

↗
10.2307/747784

↗
10.1111/1467-9817.00049

↗
10.1017/CBO9780511621024

↗
10.3758/BF03195428

↗
10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409

↗
10.1007/BF00288704

↗
10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.997

↗
10.4324/9780203272732

↗
10.1111/1467-9280.01419

↗
10.1111/1468-0122.00258

↗
10.1080/0013188032000137238

↗
10.1177/030631270203200512

↗
10.1080/03098770220149576

↗
10.1111/1467-8535.00185

↗
10.1111/1467-8535.00300

↗
10.1177/0959353502012002005

↗
10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041

↗
10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.291

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 13 View in citation network →