Writing Together: Gender's Effect on Collaboration

Louise Rehling San Francisco State University

Abstract

Recent studies identify gendered differences in communication and collaboration styles which suggest consequences for professional writing classrooms. If, indeed, men tend to stereotype women as clerks, prefer hierarchical collaboration, and value product over process, and, too, if gendered differences tend to increase counterproductive dissent, then the gender balance of writing groups might affect their dominant styles in those respects. However, when I analyzed the behaviors of over sixty student groups in my professional writing classes, I did not find gender balancing to have such effects. Instead, however, I observed other gender-related effects on collaboration: tendencies to stereotype men as technical experts and to self-segregate into gendered working teams. These findings suggest new perspectives on the role of gender for collaborative groups in professional writing classrooms.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1996-04-01
DOI
10.2190/xdca-www0-v9fn-y4u9
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (8)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Research in the Teaching of English
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 8 →
  1. Rhetoric Review
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 13 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056998905200112
  2. 10.1177/108056998805100112
  3. 10.1109/47.272859
  4. 10.1177/002194369102800104
  5. 10.1177/002194369102800203
  6. 10.1016/B978-0-12-054752-4.50032-4
  7. 10.1177/001872678603900204
  8. 10.1080/10570319009374324
  9. 10.1177/002194368602300205
  10. 10.1177/002194368802500402
  11. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1988.tb02047.x
  12. 10.1016/B978-0-12-752075-9.50015-5
  13. 10.1080/01463378509369589
CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network →