“Something in Motion and Something to Eat Attract the Crowd”: Cooking with Science at the 1893 World's Fair

Gail Lippincott University of North Texas

Abstract

Studying past examples of successful technical communication may offer insight into strategies that worked with technologies and audiences in an earlier time. This article examines the texts documenting a controversy before and during the Chicago World's Fair of 1893. Ellen Swallow Richards, chemist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Bertha Honore Palmer, president of the Fair's Board of Lady Managers, had distinctly different visions of how cooking technology should be presented. Palmer invited Richards to create a Model Kitchen in the Woman's Building, but Richards wanted to avoid gendering the new knowledge of nutrition and she fought to control her exhibit. The multimedia Richards used in her resulting Rumford Kitchen exhibit reminds us that sometimes an entertaining but familiar atmosphere might be the best way to introduce threatening new knowledge and technology, particularly to our increasingly international and intergenerational audiences.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2003-04-01
DOI
10.2190/qxuu-wbaf-ewcx-vfmd
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly

Cites in this index (7)

  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 7 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1111/j.1542-734X.1995.00045.x
  2. 10.7551/mitpress/4130.001.0001
  3. Spurious Coin: Science, Management, and the History of Technical Writing in the 20th-Cent…
  4. 10.1163/9789004418417_008
  5. 10.1525/9780520918733-003
  6. 10.2307/1889653
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →