Scientific Articles in Internet Homepages: Assumptions upon Lay Audiences

Isabel Gonzalez-Pueyo Universidad de Zaragoza ; Alicia Redrado Universidad de Zaragoza

Abstract

This article studies a set of scientific/technical articles published in Internet homepages. Focusing upon current trends on genre theory and the functional approach deployed by Halliday and Martin [1], linguistic features and schematic structure are analyzed in relation to more standard genres. The structural analysis suggests that these kind of texts imaginatively realize and assume the standpoint and main tenets of a lay audience that just consumes specific genres, most being analogous to the persuasive, manipulative, amusement-oriented genres of TV news stories, tabloids, and commercials. It is pondered that much of the “technological utopianism” (term used by Kling [2] surrounding the ever increasingly standardized Internet discourse turns the Internet into a productive vehicle to sustain technoscience as modern myth by spreading and forging that utopian imagery into the audience's consciousness, and that scientists are taking fruitful advantage of the utopian, futurist, and often sensationalist accounts of the Internet as a formidable frame to advertise themselves and the deeds achieved in their laboratories.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2003-04-01
DOI
10.2190/7aea-quwc-9d7j-yrrr
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/01972243.1994.9960166
  2. 10.4135/9781452243689.n3
  3. 10.4324/9780203312612
  4. 10.1075/z.59
  5. 10.1017/CBO9781139524513.012
  6. 10.5465/amr.1992.4279545
  7. 10.1080/01972240050133652
  8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:2<202::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-R
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →