A New Look at Infinitives in Business and Technical Writing

Marshall Myers Eastern Kentucky University

Abstract

This article begins by arguing that the infinitive phrase has not been taken seriously in writing because writers have been too concerned with Bishop Robert Lowth's proscription against the split infinitive. However, careful examination of three types of technical prose (instructions, annual reports, and “junk mail”) reveals that more than one sentence in four contains an infinitive phrase. The article then argues that two linguistic theories do not adequately explain the overwhelming presence of infinitives in the three types of prose. The reason for the presence of infinitives seems to be that they fulfill several rhetorical purposes, including vigor, symmetry, emphasis, variety, economy, and depersonalization. Implications for writing and teaching are also discussed.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2002-01-01
DOI
10.2190/bcdr-qlrg-grux-v1e0
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1037/e412952005-009
  2. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.1957
  3. 10.2307/415539
  4. 10.1093/llc/10.4.247
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network →