Confusion in the Classroom: Does Logos Mean Logic?

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication Oct 1999

Confusion in the Classroom: Does Logos Mean Logic?

Joseph Little University of California, Santa Barbara

Abstract

The redefinition of logos as an appeal to logic is a mistaken association found all too often in the technical communication classroom. Logic inheres in all three proofs of persuasion; moreover, Aristotle used logos within the context of classical rhetoric to refer to the argument or speech itself. In this light, the proofs of persuasion represent the set of all logical means whereby the speaker can lead a “right-thinking” audience to infer something. If that something is an emotion, the appeal is to pathos; if it is about the character of the speaker, the appeal is to ethos; and if it is about the argument or speech itself, the appeal is to logos. This interpretation reinstates all three proofs of persuasion as legitimate, logical means to different proximate ends and provides a coherent definition of logos, consonant with Aristotle's Rhetoric, to the next generation of technical communicators.

Journal: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published: 1999-10-01
DOI: 10.2190/7aty-rvvu-53fj-mvc5
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical theory technical communication argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Little (2003)

The Peter Effect in Early Experimental Education Research

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Little (2001)

Understanding Statistical Significance: A Conceptual History

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Little (2001)

Toward Sociocultural Sensitivity in Rhetorical Studies of Analogy: Theoretical …

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 1 work outside this index ↓

10.1086/463440

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network →