Understanding Statistical Significance: A Conceptual History

Joseph Little University of California, Santa Barbara

Abstract

Few concepts in the social sciences have wielded more discriminatory power over the status of knowledge claims than that of statistical significance. Currently operationalized as a = 0.05, statistical significance frequently separates publishable from nonpublishable research, renewable from nonrenewable grants, and, in the eyes of many, experimental success from failure. If literacy is envisioned as a sort of competence in a set of social and intellectual practices, then scientific literacy must encompass the realization that this cardinal arbiter of social scientific knowledge was not born out of an immanent logic of mathematics but socially constructed and reconstructed in response to sociohistoric conditions.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
2001-10-01
DOI
10.2190/tul8-x9n5-n000-8lkv
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (5)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Rhetoric Review
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1097/00006842-198909000-00009
  2. 10.1080/00220973.1993.10806593
  3. 10.1515/9780691210520
  4. 10.1093/biomet/3.1.63
  5. 10.1093/biomet/6.1.1
  6. 10.1093/biomet/11.3.159
  7. 10.1037/13786-000
  8. 10.2307/2331868
  9. 10.1093/biomet/10.1.85
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network →