Analogy in science: Where do we go from here?

Joseph Little University of California, Santa Barbara

Abstract

Abstract Rhetoric of science has come a long way in understanding the role of analogy in scientific language and thought. Further progress is hindered, however, by the analytic and methodological limitations native to classical rhetoric. Accordingly, I turn to cognitive psychology for an adequate theory of analogy through which to remedy this stalled research program. Using Dedre Gentner's Structure Mapping theory of analogy, I investigate the role of the Saturnian analogy in Hantaro Nagaoka ‘s theory of atomic structure and show how the analogy constrained him, serving sometimes as an asset to his argument and other times as a serious liability.

Journal
Rhetoric Society Quarterly
Published
2000-01-01
DOI
10.1080/02773940009391170
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Technical Communication Quarterly
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 7 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Rhetoric Review
Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/00335637409383253
  2. 10.1525/rh.1989.7.1.55
  3. 10.1080/00335637509383301
  4. 10.1080/00335638609383782
  5. Science, Reason, and Rhetoric.
  6. 10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3
  7. Metaphor and Thought,
  8. 10.1207/s15327809jls0601_2
  9. 10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
  10. 10.1207/s15516709cog1303_1
  11. 10.1038/069437b0
CrossRef global citation count: 11 View in citation network →