Scientific and Technical Communicators' Perceptions of the Performance Appraisal Interview

Earl E. McDowell University of Minnesota System

Abstract

This study surveys scientific and technical communicators to determine their perceptions of their role as interviewees in the performance appraisal interview. The results reveal that interviewees think the appraisal process is unreliable and invalid, that managers do not stimulate growth and development in the appraisal interview, and that subordinates have little influence concerning what goes on in the department. Other results are discussed in the article.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1995-01-01
DOI
10.2190/mjke-e8yq-6u6l-xarv
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (6) · 1 in this index

  1. Interviewing Practices for Technical Writers
  2. The Appraisal Interview: Objectives Methods, and Skills
  3. Interviewing Practices for Technical Writers
  4. Research Methods in Scientific and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 6 →
  1. Journal of the Society for Technical Communication