Scientific and Technical Communicators' Perceptions of the Performance Appraisal Interview

Earl E. McDowell University of Minnesota System

Abstract

This study surveys scientific and technical communicators to determine their perceptions of their role as interviewees in the performance appraisal interview. The results reveal that interviewees think the appraisal process is unreliable and invalid, that managers do not stimulate growth and development in the appraisal interview, and that subordinates have little influence concerning what goes on in the department. Other results are discussed in the article.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1995-01-01
DOI
10.2190/mjke-e8yq-6u6l-xarv
Open Access
Closed

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Rhetoric Society Quarterly
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (1)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network →