Reduced Text Structure at Two Text Levels: Impacts on the Performance of Technical Readers

Michael J. Wenger Binghamton University ; Jan H. Spyridakis University of Washington

Abstract

Cues to text structure have been proposed to operate a number of different levels and it has been suggested that lower-level factors (e.g., word decoding) are more critical to reader performance than are higher-level factors (e.g., paragraph and text structure). The current study involved presenting texts in their base form and with cues to coherence at two levels—at the word and paragraph level—removed. These manipulations were performed on technical texts at two levels of familiarity and were presented to technical readers. Tests of recall, recognition, and problem-solving revealed that while removal of cues to local coherence did produce reliable decrements in reader performance, more dramatic effects occurred when both types of cues were removed. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance to questions of information design.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1993-10-01
DOI
10.2190/gwcq-84cr-7dvb-rcnn
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Also cites 37 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1080/14640748908402353
  2. 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.667
  3. 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.791
  4. 10.3758/BF03214228
  5. 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90056-3
  6. 10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.357
  7. 10.1037/0022-0663.74.6.828
  8. 10.1080/01638538609544646
  9. 10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.133
  10. 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90052-2
  11. 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90069-C
  12. 10.3102/00028312021001121
  13. 10.1080/01638539009544767
  14. 10.1037/0022-0663.73.4.451
  15. 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60249-2
  16. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90004-5
  17. 10.2307/747389
  18. 10.1080/00220671.1985.10885617
  19. 10.2307/747518
  20. 10.1080/10862968309547487
  21. 10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90327-X
  22. 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90746-0
  23. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90060-X
  24. 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.262
  25. 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90496-6
  26. 10.1037/h0022472
  27. 10.1044/0161-1461.1303.177
  28. 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90001-G
  29. 10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
  30. 10.2307/747969
  31. 10.3758/BF03197740
  32. 10.1016/0749-596X(86)90041-0
  33. 10.1080/0141192910170405
  34. 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80003-2
  35. 10.1080/10862968009547359
  36. 10.2307/747135
  37. 10.1109/47.44538
CrossRef global citation count: 7 View in citation network →