Computer-Based Writing and Communication: Some Implications for Technical Communication Activities

Leslie A. Olsen University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Abstract

Most research on writing has focussed on the work of single authors working by hand on prose texts. However, much professional work is collaborative, computer-based, not exclusively prose, and not well studied. Some preliminary research suggests that the use of computers will affect the cognitive activities of individual authors in several domains of immediate relevance to composition and technical communication practitioners: planning activities, editing activities, the writing of novice computer users or poor typists, and writing for electronic mail and other electronic communication. Research reported here suggests that the rapidly increasing capability of computer-based writing systems will force communication researchers to 1) broaden their basic conception of and methods of studying “author” to include authoring teams, 2) broaden the type of material studied from that which is purely or largely textual to that which much more frequently includes other types of information, and 3) track changes in “genre conventions” resulting from the increased capabilities of computer-based systems—in short, to assess the impacts of the medium on the message.

Journal
Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Published
1989-04-01
DOI
10.2190/682k-dp1t-x3qg-byh9
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (9)

  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
  5. Technical Communication Quarterly
Show all 9 →
  1. Technical Communication Quarterly
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Written Communication

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. Thomas R. H., Forsdick H. C., Crowley T. R., Schaaf R. W., Tomlinson R., Travers V. M., and Robertson G. B., …
  2. Morris J., Satyanarayan M., Conner M., Howard J. H., Rosenthal D. S. H., and Smith F. D., Andrew: A Distribut…
  3. Katz A., Issues in Defining an Equations Representation Standard, Network Working Group RFC 1003, USC/ISI, Ma…
  4. 10.2307/357975
  5. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., and McGuire T. W., Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication, O…
  6. Kiesler S. and Sproull L., Response Effects in the Electronic Survey, Public Opinion Quarterly, 1986.
  7. 10.2307/255867
  8. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  9. 10.1016/S0898-5898(89)80001-4
CrossRef global citation count: 17 View in citation network →